• Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.

• Unsupported files: the diff contains files that Sourcery does not currently support during reviews.

While the addition of the experience section enriches the content, it also introduces a higher level of complexity due to the deeper nesting of properties. This can increase cognitive load for developers, making the code harder to navigate and modify. To enhance maintainability, consider adopting a more modular approach. For instance, defining each section as a separate object or externalizing the data can simplify the structure, making it easier to manage and update. Here's a simplified example:

const experience = {
  title: "Ausbildung",
  description: "Hier ist meine Ausbildung:",
  details: [
    { type: "apprenticeship", description: "Lehre als Informatiker EFZ" },
    { type: "gymnasium", description: "Gymnasium als 9. Klasse" },
    { type: "school", description: "7. & 8. Klasse Sekundarstufe" },
  ],
};

const pageComponents = {
  // other sections...
  experience,
};

This approach reduces the depth of the object structure and makes each section easier to understand and modify independently.

After reviewing the proposed changes, it's clear that the addition of the experience section introduces a deeper level of nesting and a more complex data structure to manage. This complexity, primarily through the nested dates and types objects, could potentially make future maintenance and data manipulation more challenging. However, it's also understood that such additions are necessary to extend the functionality and content of the application, particularly for detailing educational experiences in a structured manner.

While the increase in complexity is justified by the need for added functionality, it's always beneficial to consider strategies for managing complexity effectively. This could include documenting the data structure clearly to aid future developers in understanding and working with the code, or considering modularization strategies that could help isolate complex data structures, making them easier to manage and update independently.

The goal of these suggestions is to ensure that the code remains as maintainable and scalable as possible, even as new features and data structures are introduced.

While the addition of the experience section enriches the Translation type with more detailed information, it also introduces a higher level of complexity due to increased nesting and the overall size of the structure. This can make the code harder to navigate and maintain, especially as further modifications or extensions are made in the future.

To address these concerns, consider flattening the structure as much as possible and separating concerns into distinct types. For example, the ExperienceSection and ExperienceTypes could be extracted into separate types outside of the main Translation type. This would not only make the main structure easier to read and understand but also simplify modifications within these specific sections.

Here's a suggested refactor for clarity and maintainability:

type ExperienceSection = {
  title: string,
  description: string,
  dates: {
    today: string,
  },
  types: ExperienceTypes,
};

type ExperienceTypes = {
  apprenticeship: string,
  gymnasium: string,
  school: string,
};

export type Translation = {
  // Other properties remain unchanged
  sections: {
    // Other sections remain unchanged
    experience: ExperienceSection,
    // Continue with other sections
  },
};

By adopting this approach, we can maintain a cleaner and more manageable codebase, making it easier for developers to work with these structures in the future.

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.